Churchill as an Authority
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Peer Review and Churchill
I’ve written a large number of articles over the last forty years, but rather few research papers going through the peer review or refereeing process. One of them came to mind when I read a paper we’re publishing in the current issue, by Claudiu Heteliu and others, on possible ‘coercive citation’—if that’s an unfamiliar expression [1], it will become clear soon... One of the reviewers of my pap...
متن کاملEncounters with Winston Churchill.
W Russell Brain (1895-1966) was two weeks short of his fifty-fourth birthday when he first saw Winston Churchill in consultation at the request of Lord Moran' on 5 October 1949. Russell Brain was a consultant physician at the (then) London Hospital and the Maida Vale Hospital For Nervous Diseases. He earned his living primarily from his private practice in Harley Street as a consultant neurolog...
متن کاملEndocrinology as Paradigm, Endocrinology as Authority
What I would like to talk about with you tonight is endocrinology as paradigm, and endocrinology as authority. What is the process by which the ideas in a science such as endocrinology change with time, and how best can new ideas develop? How do ideas in science influence society, aside from the obvious effect of technology? Two things inspired me to speak to you on this subject. The first is t...
متن کاملDelegation of Authority as an Optimal (In)complete Contract
Delegation of Authority as an Optimal (In)complete Contract The present paper aims to contribute to the literature on the foundations of incomplete contracts by providing conditions under which simple delegation of authority is the solution to the complete-contracting problem of the parties. We consider a hold-up framework where both parties profit from an investment that raises the value of an...
متن کاملPublic Consensus as Constitutional Authority
Barry Friedman's new book The Will of the People attempts to dissolve constitutional law's countermajoritarian difficulty by showing that, in practice, the Supreme Court does only what the public will tolerate. His account succeeds if "the countermajoritarian difficulty" refers to the threat that courts will run the country in ways that contravene majority preference, but not if the "the counte...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Chemical & Engineering News Archive
سال: 1954
ISSN: 0009-2347,2157-4936
DOI: 10.1021/cen-v032n005.p381